- Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 mac os#
- Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 movie#
- Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 install#
- Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 full#
What I really wanted to ask you was, what features are still missing? What was promised at the purchase of NeXT but hasn't been delived yet?įinally, how was it years late? You are specifically talking about the NeXT/OpenStep core as far as I can tell.
Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 mac os#
How was it forced into play? Because Apple chose it over BeOS? Because Apple recompiled OpenStep for PowerPC? Because Apple came up with Carbon libraries to seamlessly run classic Mac OS Software in OS X natively with almost zero changes to code? Man did they force that sucker in. You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? ) And, it was years late and initially very lacking in promised features (many of which it still lacks.) "
"The "foundation" for OS X was kind of forced into play, you know.
Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 movie#
I just played a high-definition QuickTime movie trailer for the first time. Dashboard, Spotlight and the new iChat AV are very cool. The first improvements I noticed are with Safari and Finder operations. So, I installed 10.4 on my G4 iBook, too. I was pleased with the boost in overall system performance and did not encounter any software incompatibilities.
But today, I installed Tiger on a secondary drive in my dual processor G4 desktop Mac.
Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 install#
I was a little hesitant to install the new OS on my two Macs until the first update (10.4.1) is released. JAS - Thursday, link OS 10.4 has already exceeded my expectations.This may be more of a personal preference thing, but I definitely preferred the way TextEdit's zoom behaved in Panther. You can get the same functionality as Panther's TextEdit by enabling Word Wrap, but when doing so, you get a fairly useless layout border around your text as seen below: maximize debate the first time I used OS X was that I missed the ability to maximize windows). The button now acts as "maximize", which I don't like so much (surprisingly enough, because my first reaction to the zoom vs.
Word processor for mac os x 10.4.11 full#
Hitting the zoom button in TextEdit now seems to expand the window to the full width of the screen, instead of just zooming to a larger, better proportioned window. There's a new checkbox in the Save dialog box - "If no extension is provided, use. The other big feature of TextEdit is its support for bulleted and numbered lists not a huge improvement, but something that makes it more useful when you don't really need more than a slightly more powerful text editor. The only requirement for saving as HTML is that you need to be in TextEdit's rich text editing mode. The HTML produced by TextEdit is just as simple and as clean as you'd expect from a text editor that still appears hardly intimidating. You can select from strict or transitional HTML 4.01 or XHTML 1.0, and you can choose whether or not you want to use CSS. Not only will TextEdit save in HTML formats now, but the HTML saving options in TextEdit are options that I wish all applications which produce HTML had. To me, the biggest feature of TextEdit is the ability to now save to HTML. I've seen a similar transition with OS X's TextEdit in Tiger, not to say that TextEdit wasn't already infinitely more capable than Notepad, but with Tiger, it has gone from a pretty impressive text editor to a more full-featured editor, while still maintaining the simplicity of TextEdit. The Windows 2000/XP version of Notepad fixed a lot of my complaints, and then Notepad became much more of a useful tool to me. As a Windows user, I always hated Wordpad, but early on, Notepad was too simplified for a lot of tasks - forcing me to use Word when I didn't exactly want to.
0 kommentar(er)
